Article
Tech Giants Streaming Streamers Entertainment

Wake up call for Hollywood as YouTube directors take the top two spots at the box office

by Ian Lyall
The iconic Hollywood sign is prominently displayed on a hillside, framed by palm trees which create a tropical ambiance. The photo captures a clear view of the sign against a backdrop of warm-toned hills and vegetation. — Credit: Photo by CURTIS HYSTAD / Unsplash cPhoto by CURTIS HYSTAD / Unsplash
Photo by CURTIS HYSTAD / Unsplash

The top two movies at the US box office last weekend were directed by people who built their audiences on YouTube. Not YouTubers in the vlogging sense. Filmmakers who used YouTube as a distribution platform for work that looked and felt like cinema.

Curry Barker, who directed Obsession, posted a 60-minute horror film on YouTube before making the jump to theatrical release. The creator behind Back Rooms started with a special effects demo that went viral, a short film with a retro aesthetic that demonstrated genuine technical skill.

Both used YouTube the way an earlier generation used film festivals: as proof of concept, audience builder and calling card.

The studio parallel

YouTube is reportedly considering buying struggling movie theatres, creating its own studio and signing creators to multi-film deals. The comparison to early 1900s Hollywood, when studio founders built vertically integrated empires that controlled production, distribution and exhibition, is not subtle.

Google owns the distribution platform. It has the audience data. It has the creator relationships. Adding production and exhibition would close the loop in a way that no traditional studio can replicate.

The economics

YouTube ad revenue for most creators is modest relative to the effort involved. A creator with millions of subscribers and genuine filmmaking talent can earn more from a theatrical release than from years of ad-supported content.

The studios have spent a decade losing audiences to streaming and short-form content. The creators who captured those audiences are now coming for theatrical distribution, bringing their fans with them.

The question is whether this is a trend or an anomaly. Two films in one weekend is notable. Whether YouTube-native directors can sustain theatrical careers, or whether the novelty fades after the first wave, remains to be seen.

Either way, the pipeline has shifted. The next generation of filmmakers is not waiting for permission from a studio. They are building audiences first and making films second, and the audience is already there when they arrive.

by Ian Lyall