Article
AI News Tech Giants

SpaceX's $40 billion debt raise is the right strategic move in the AI arms race, analysts reckon

Yorkville Ives said what separates SpaceX from a neocloud is the stack around the chips: its own silicon from the Austin fab, Starship, Starlink and its own frontier models as captive demand.

by Ian Lyall
The image captures two rockets launching simultaneously from a launch pad, leaving trails of fire and smoke. The backdrop features a partly cloudy sky, emphasizing the power and technology behind the launch. — Credit: Photo by SpaceX / Unsplash cPhoto by SpaceX / Unsplash
Photo by SpaceX / Unsplash

SpaceX's $40 billion debt financing for graphics processing units (GPUs) is the right strategic move to build out its hyperscaler footprint, according to Dan Ives, an analyst at Yorkville Ives.

Hyperscalers are the handful of giant cloud companies, such as Amazon and Google, that can fund AI computing capacity on their own balance sheets.

SpaceX, Elon Musk's rocket and satellite group, closed the callable debt financing on Sunday.

Yorkville Ives said the terms say more about where the AI infrastructure race is heading than the headline number does.

The debt runs through a special purpose vehicle (a separate legal entity), which keeps it off the balance sheet and protects the investment-grade rating.

The chips arrive in the first half of 2027.

The financing sits on top of fourth-quarter capex guidance of $35 billion to $40 billion, against $19.6 billion in the third quarter.

Neoclouds and the debt squeeze

Musk said debt markets have "almost entirely shut off" for companies without substantial revenue independent of AI data centres.

He added that more than 200 neoclouds, the specialist firms that rent out computing capacity, face consolidation or failure.

Yorkville Ives disagreed with the broad version of that call.

It said compute demand still exceeds supply, and neoclouds with contracted capacity and funded balance sheets will keep filling the gap the hyperscalers cannot.

The losers, it said, will be those that built on debt against uncontracted demand.

SpaceX gets the money because Starlink and launch generate cash unrelated to AI, the analyst said.

What the money funds

SpaceX's Superintelligence segment made $7.6 billion of revenue in the third quarter at a 66% EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation) margin.

Nameplate compute was 1.7 gigawatts, heading to more than 2 gigawatts by the end of this year and roughly 10 gigawatts by the end of 2027.

The contracted base includes Anthropic at $1.25 billion a month and Google at $920 million a month.

A fourth hosting agreement worth about $13 billion a year starts from December.

Yorkville Ives said what separates SpaceX from a neocloud is the stack around the chips: its own silicon from the Austin fab, Starship, Starlink and its own frontier models as captive demand.

The Tesla question

Musk said on the third-quarter calls that SpaceX and Tesla have formed special committees of independent directors, and that he is recused.

He said terms have not been agreed, and that Tesla would need approval from 50% of all shares outstanding, which he called a high hurdle.

Musk also said he thinks a combination is a good idea, and Tesla already holds a $2 billion SpaceX stake.

Yorkville Ives put the odds of a merger by the end of 2027 at 80% to 90%.

It said the price that gets it through is above $500 a share for Tesla.

Its $500 target values the vehicle fleet at about $165 a share and autonomy and Optimus, Tesla's humanoid robot, at about $335.

Tesla shareholders, it argued, will not vote for an exchange ratio that values those businesses at today's price.

The firm rates both SpaceX and Tesla Outperform, with price targets of $225 and $500 respectively.

Note: the report says it may not be used as input to any AI model without Yorkville Ives' written consent, and carries an "intended for" watermark for uk@proactiveinvestors.com, so check that is cleared before this runs.

by Ian Lyall